What is caesars law

When was Caesars Challenge created? When did Super Caesars Palace happen? When was The Forum Shops at Caesars created? When did Caesars Challenge end? When was Caesars Entertainment Corporation created? What is the population of Caesars Entertainment Corporation? What is Caesars Entertainment Corporation's population? When was Caesars Atlantic City created? When was Live at Caesars Palace created?

When was Super Caesars Palace created? What was Platos effect on present day? What were Julius Caesars achievements? Does the Seattle Washington Columbia city little Caesars deliver? How many rooms does the Caesars Palace in Las Vegas have? People also asked. What was in Julius Caesar's will? View results. Trending Questions. Give me food and I will live give me water and I will die what am I? What is bigger than an asteroid but smaller than Mercury and farther from the sun than Neptune?

Has a human ever been mailed via the United States Postal Service? Still have questions? Find more answers. Previously Viewed.

Unanswered Questions. Who was the supreme commander in the olive branch petition? In law, anything spelled contrary to the rules of English is a legal fiction. So when you accept improper spelling, you are actually accepting an entirely new name: a name given to you by the State. The other key part of the fictitious identity is the birth date. There are usually other numbers as well, but this is the key one.

While your parents may have told you, and a birth certificate may say so, you can never be qualified to testify as to the day you were born. It is something you can't possibly remember, and therefore cannot be a witness to. Because of this, every time a State employee asks you what your birth date is and you tell them, they have made a liar of you.

You have given them hearsay information, inadmissible in a court of law. If they wanted your parents to testify, or to enter your birth certificate as evidence, that would be fine. However, it will only and always be hearsay if it comes from you. Thus this date on an identification document is another fiction, because you will constantly be asked to verify that it is correct, and you cannot ever testify truthfully if it is or not.

Most State benefits are only available to him, and he is the actual citizen of the State. Things are deliberately structured this way to get the lawful Christian man to volunteer to identify himself instead as the artificial PERSON, and therefore a subject of the State. Are you really a Person? A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested The law of persons is the law of status or condition.

It has nothing at all to do with law. Idem Sonans: "Sounding the same. In pleadings, when a name which it is material to state, is wrongly spelled, yet if it be idem sonans with that proved, it is sufficient, as Segrave for Seagrave. Yet in writing they are easy to distinguish.

Not surprisingly, it is just as easy to distinguish between the nation and the State. This appears correctly on printed documents. People are not so careful when hand-writing these names, as they seldom know there is a difference.

Determined by Status Are you under Contract? The above chart should make clear that simply being within the geographic boundaries of the nation is not sufficient to make you subject to the statutes of the State.

Yet the State has been so successful in getting us all to volunteer into its scheme that you probably don't know anyone for whom this makes a practical difference. The Divine Right of Kings When we search out the origins of this modern governmental dichotomy, we find it rooted in two very different views of the source of rightful authority. The established view was that all authority flows from God Himself, and that the only scriptural form of government is a monarchy, presided over by a King.

Thus, the people were subject to the King's authority so long as the King was subject to God's authority. This view survives today in governmental oath's of office. The Queen of England is sworn to uphold the laws of God and the proclamation of the gospel. In her coronation ceremony, this oath was immediately followed by the presentation of the Holy Scriptures, lest there be any doubt as to what laws and gospel these referred to.

In New Zealand, and no doubt in the rest of the British Commonwealth, the police and judges are sworn to serve the Queen, as she is still the head of the nation. Thus the people are to obey the police and judges because they are under a lawful chain of authority traceable back to God Himself.

Consent of the Governed But along with the Reformation came a competing idea of how to set up a legitimate form of government. Of course, the thinking was that this new form would be superior to the old, as it would address the abuses that were so prevalent among Kings who did not take God's authority over them seriously enough.

Instead of appealing to the scriptures for its authority, this new form of government would be created by a group of men simply agreeing on how they wanted to be governed. First, it laid all the blame for the colonies' problems at the foot of King George, dealing a major blow to the already embattled concept of monarchy. Second, it clearly stated the social-contract view as the basis for the authority of the new government. What had really been created for the first time in history was a political entity independent of the biblical authority structure of previous nations.

This was to be the new model for the world as evidenced by the roll-out of the nation-state across the entire globe, and its accompanying organizational document, a constitution. An interesting note is that in New Zealand the people are told that they do not have a constitution. However, a peek into the Preamble of the Australian Constitution shows: 6. Ponder that one for a while. Of course, to sell this new idea regarding government required a mythology that it was an improvement on all previous forms.

America, we were told, was to be a model of freedom for the rest of the world. In other words, once government based on the whims of men was accepted, it could be sold wholesale to everyone else on the planet. What they failed to tell anyone was the catch: a constitution creates constitutors.

Constitutor: "civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another ; and this is always a principal obligation. If we turn to Article Six of the U. Pay off the debt, and the State ceases to exist! The existence of all modern governments is predicated on the fact that their citizens have become surety for someone else's debt, and this debt can never be repaid. Did you ever wonder who actually has the money lying around to make such enormous loans?

Is there some nation out there that is super-rich, loaning all their money to the rest of the world? Enter the illusion of modern banking. Pretty neat, huh? So for the game to work, those paying the debt must all be members of a State, not merely a nation. This creates the necessity of a constitution to turn men into citizens, or constitutors of the State.

Then they are bound by the statutes written for the purpose of collecting this debt. What is at first surprising is just how similar the statutes are in distant countries like New Zealand and the United States, for example. How can this be so? Once a debt is established, it becomes a means of control just as scripture says. Rumor has it that at one time or another every nation has defaulted on its debt, forcing it to declare bankruptcy.

This event severely undermines the law of the nation. Bankruptcy: "The state or condition of a bankrupt. Bankrupt laws are an encroachment upon the common law. When a nation declares bankruptcy, all its assets are seized and managed by another entity charged with using those assets to pay the debt.

What are the assets of a nation? The three principle ones are its land, its vehicles and its people! All titles to land and vehicles, along with all birth certificates are turned over to the entity managing the bankruptcy. But what entity is that? It is the State, created by debt and eager for a greater role in managing that debt!

So now the statutes for managing the bankruptcy take precedence over the laws of the bankrupt nation. This is accomplished more subtly for several reasons. The most significant reason for disguising what is going on is that the most productive slaves are the ones who believe they are free.

So you continue the propaganda about freedom in the now bankrupt nation because it makes debt collection far easier. In all likelihood, your name is spelled properly on your birth certificate. If you immigrate to New Zealand, the visa will also be issued in your real name.

Immigration, it turns out, is really transferring yourself as an asset from one nation to another, and it will be the nation of New Zealand, not the State of NEW ZEALAND that considers you of sufficient value to accept for bankruptcy settlement purposes. So if you look on the title to your house or vehicle, you will see that it has the ALL CAPS name on it, meaning it is not really owned by you at all. However, you cannot leave your house without the State pushing contracts and benefits at you for your acceptance.

You are presumed to have agreed to whatever those terms are when you agreed to be under contract. So if those terms contradict fundamental freedoms, it is presumed that you gave them away willingly. For these purposes permission shall be granted by this law to specified persons to drive wagons for the reasons stated.

Two half-year campaigns may count as separate years. If anyone has exemption from military service by statutes or plebiscites or treaty, whereby he should not properly' serve against his will, he is not subject to this restriction.

If any of the above-mentioned persons acts in contravention of this law he shall be liable to a penalty of 50, sesterces payable to the State, and anyone so minded shall be entitled to sue for this sum.

Nor shall he declare the election of anyone who is employed as auctioneer, master of funeral ceremonies, or undertaker," so long as he is employed in such a trade, as duumvir, quattuorvir, or whoever may be magistrate in that community. Nor shall he choose, substitute, or coopt such persons into the senate among the decurions or the conscripts.

Nor with malice aforethought shall he call upon such persons for their vote nor shall he require them to speak or to cast their vote.

If anyone does so in contravention of this law he shall be liable to a penalty of 50, sesterces payable to the State, and anyone so minded shall be entitled to sue for this sum. If any of the aforesaid persons in contravention of this law takes his place or gives his vote among the decurions or the conscripts in the senate of the above-mentioned communities he shall be liable to a penalty of 50, sesterces to be paid to the State, and anyone so minded shall be entitled to sue for that sum.

He shall not ask him for an opinion there nor with malice aforethought shall bid him vote orally or by ballot. No one who has supreme authority in the aforesaid communities by the vote of their citizens shall allow with malice aforethought any ineligible person to attend the senate with the decurions or the conscripts, to be included in their number, to give his vote orally or by ballot there.

He shall not accept such persons as candidates for election in any electoral assembly of the people or of the plebs. If in violation of this law such a person has been elected by the aforesaid assemblies the magistrate shall not announce the election.

And no magistrate or person with authority in that community shall permit him, with malice aforethought, to witness the games or to attend public banquets with the senate, the decurions, or the conscripts. Nor shall such persons take their seat in the senatorial circle of decurions and conscripts to witness games or gladitorial combats or to participate in public banquets.

If anyone of such persons is announced as selected in contravention of this law, he shall not become duumvir or quattuorvir or hold any magistracy or office of authority in that community.